The Higher Liberty
God gave man the right to choose. Man gave government the right to choose for him. Those who use to be called representatives are known today as lawmakers.
We live in a changing world and are often changed by the world we live in. Not only are people organic, but society, language and constitutions are organic and regularly change. We live in a cause and effect universe, and as we change things around us, we are changed by those things.
Most people can tolerate slow change but sudden change or reversal of what we have come to believe as true can shake the foundation of our thinking like an earthquake. Some experienced this when we first suggested that Romans Chapter 13 would be better understood if it was read:
“Let every soul be subject unto the higher liberty. For there is no liberty but of God: the liberties that be are ordained of God. Whosoever therefore resisteth (opposes) liberty, resisteth (opposes) the ordinance of God: and they that resist (sets one’s self against) shall receive to themselves damnation. For rulers are not a terror to good works, but to the evil. Wilt thou then not be afraid of the liberty? Do that which is good, and thou shalt have praise of the same.” Romans 13:1-3
The claim that Paul is saying that we should be at liberty is a bold accusation against the doctrines of much of modern Christendom. Of course none of this suggests that the first English translation of the Bible are wrong because the Greek word exousia used in these verses does mean power. The problem is that it is one of a half dozen Greek words translated into power. The question is “power” in what sense and which definition of the word “power” should be applied. Have the people been steadily deceived, by either negligence or design, arrogance or ignorance? It was prophesied that they would be.
A central theme throughout the Bible is to set men free. Although the use of words changes over time the Greek Glossary of Aristotelian Terms states that exousia means “right”.1 Aristotle actually exemplifies its use in the statement, “The right (exousia) to do anything one wishes…”2
In Plato’s notes the “Greek words for freedom (are) eleutheros (liberal/Free), exousia (Freedom/Power to do something) …”3
While Plato and Aristotle’s definition of the word exousia was from a classical Greek period, their opinion was still in conformity with the second century A.D. Cynic philosopher, Enomaos, whose writings were preserved by Eusubius. Aldo Brancacci examines the definition of ‘freedom’ in his ‘Liberta e fato in Enamao di Gadara’ where exousia is “used by Enomaos to refer to human freedom…which expresses ‘the new concept of freedom in opposition to the already defunct and unhelpful eleutheria’.”4 For at least five centuries the word exousia consistently referenced human liberty and freedom with the Greek term exousia.
God sent Abraham, Moses, Joshua, Samson, Gideon and a host of others to set us free in truth. Jesus came to set us free in spirit and truth and we would be free if we did what He said. It seems a slave mentality to believe that we can only be “free at last, free at last”5 when we are dead.
“If the Son therefore shall make you free, ye shall be free indeed.” John 8:36
Dissenting comments on our books and articles might be exemplified by those of Professor Ardel Caneday of New Testament Studies & Biblical Theology at Northwestern College, in Saint Paul, Minnesota.
Ardel attempted to discredit Tim Case6 who quoted extensively from one of our early NewsWithViews articles on Romans 13 in his own article A Peccancy.
Ardel states that Case commits “fallacy” by giving the etymology of the word. At the same time Ardel seems to disregard Aristotle, Plato, Enomaos, Brancacci and Bryn Mawr’s Classical Review with a vague reference to Koine Greek.
Koine Greek developed as the world of the Greeks and Romans went from free Republics to a dictatorial empire. Those governments of men made instruments of war, took the first fruits of the people, and even their sons and daughters for their own purposes. They brought about famine, wars, and pestilence that killed off millions of people. This is a pattern that history continues to repeat as we meet our own future in the present conditions of this world.
If you give men the power to choose for you they will be corrupted by that power and society will be weakened and debased. God wants us to be free souls under His authority, not human resources and merchandise for the Pharaohs and Nimrods of the world.
Most scholars are entrenched in the presumption that they could not be in error much less under a strong delusion. The people are often a victim of this same malignant malady. Pride is contagious.
All interpretations of the Gospel may not be gospel. There were many scholars among those who crucified Christ. Satan has always deluded the scholars first. It makes his job so much easier when the scholars are on his side.
Saul, who became Paul, went to the best school and had the most respected scholar as his teacher.7 The educated Saul did not know Christ nor the Gospel of the Kingdom and even persecuted Christ’s followers. Paul, through revelation, eventually counted all he had known before Christ as little more than dung.8
Ardel also suggests that Case “appeals to one of the word’s lesser used meanings in the New Testament to render that unlikely meaning the meaning of the word in Romans 13.” We must ask, lesser used by whom?
Joseph Thayer’s first definition of the Greek word exousia is the “power of choice, liberty of doing as one pleases”. It is not until the fourth definition that we see anything like “the power of rule or government”.9 The truth is most modern scholars choose not to use the primary meaning of the word exousia because it would be an indictment of the condition of the modern Church and the state to which it has brought the people it was meant to serve.
Ardel goes on to suggest that Case “fails to show that the New Testament regularly employs ἐξουσία to refer to ruling authorities, as it clearly does in Romans 13.”
The Greek word exousia [ἐξουσία] appears over 90 times in the biblical text. At least 12 times it is speaking of an individual’s, personal right or liberty. Over 50 times exousia is found in verses speaking of the “power” of God and Jesus the Christ, the anointed King, who appointed ambassadors and was proclaimed king by thousands of people including Pontius Pilate.10
More than a dozen times the word exousia is specifying a jurisdictional right to judge or a conflict of law between man’s government or the “adversary” and the Kingdom of God. If people are insistent upon using Thayer’s fourth definition of exousia “the power of rule or government”, they should be willing to apply it to Christ’s government and its jurisdictional right as one form of government.
Those who proclaimed Jesus as the Christ were proclaiming Him as their king.11 Christ sealed that Roman proclamation, nailed to the cross, in His own blood. Christians were able to live, worship and serve God, unless the people rejected Christ and chose to go under the authority or power of another by application and consent.
“Wherefore if ye be dead with Christ from the rudiments of the world, why, as though living in the world, are ye subject to ordinances,” Colossians 2:20
In Matthew 8:9 and Luke 7:8 the word exousia is used concerning an officer’s right to direct his men. That power comes from the contract his soldiers signed when they became members under his authority. The bondage of Egypt, from which Moses freed the people, was the result of their application, participation and the agreements they made in exchange for benefits and protection of the Egyptian government.
The Church was appointed by Christ so that the people did not have to apply/pray for assistance from mendacious benefactors who exercised authority. The church is another form of government and defined that way in legal dictionaries. If the Church set the table of the Lord according to the perfect law of liberty the people would still be at liberty because they would not have to eat at the table of rulers.12.
Modern preachers have removed the “Kingdom” at hand from the “Gospel of the Kingdom of God”13 and turned the hearts of the people to impure religion of the state. The Pharisees were scholars and the majority of the Pharisees voted to kill Christ,14 their rightful King.15 They chose to have no king but Caesar.16 Thank Heaven, the truth is not dependent upon democracies or scholars.
The modern Christians have arranged a world17 system, a mystery Babylon, where their ministers teach the people to sing in their churches, praising Christ as King, but send the people to pray for their daily bread and benefits to men of the world “who call themselves benefactors but exercise authority one over the other.”18
The people do take a bite out of their neighbor, devouring one another under the license of the government.19 The people wave their hands on Sunday and give lip service to God, but the rest of the week they covet their neighbor’s goods through their socialist schemes of government.
Applying to the Pharaoh for their daily bread brought the Israelites into bondage. God led the people out of that bondage and told them never to return that way. God even told the people if they chose a ruler they were to write in their constitution that he could never do anything that would return them to the bondage of Egypt.20
Common sense would require us to ask why Paul would be telling the people to remain in an Egyptian style governments rather than be free. Remember Christ came to take the Kingdom21 away from those who ruled over the people.22 Those rulers had taken away the liberties granted by God, put heavy burdens on them, and through their system of social security23 had made the word of God to none effect24 because their system was not based on charity.
Since, freeing people in Spirit and truth and living by faith has always been the mission of the prophets of God, it seems clear that Paul was saying that we should remain subject to liberty and the right to choose endowed by God. Paul understood the perfect law of liberty,25 and to oppose liberty is to oppose the will of God. If your ministers do not understand that, then maybe they do not understand Paul or Christ.
From the Book The Higher Liberty available on the Living Network.